Malignant Liberal Idiocy

I was disheartened to click on Cristina Page’s bio and find out she has a child and another on the way. The fact that she has children is not disheartening, but the fact that she has children and still advocates so feverishly for abortion “rights” is. Sadness and disgust are accurate descriptions of my reaction to her latest Huffington Post display of maniacal libiocy, “Obama: The Real Pro-Life Candidate.”

If you are not familiar with the moral decay and aspirations toward Socialism usually espoused by most bloggers at HuffPo, you might think Mrs. Page’s entry is a work of satire based on the title. One could reasonably expect to see such an outrageously contradictory headline in MAD Magazine. The sad and disgusting truth is that Mrs. Page is serious. The demented chair of the Huffington Chapter of Barry Hussein’s Fan Club’s Abortion Promotion Committee writes:

Obama has a huge opportunity to win over an unlikely voting bloc: pro-life voters. The debate over reproductive rights has for decades existed in the abstract; it’s been a back and forth volley over “values” that’s heavy on emotion and light on fact. But the facts reveal surprising truths and they ought to be hammered home by Obama. The data show that the pro-choice approach is more effective at achieving what the American public views as “pro-life” goals i.e. reducing the number of abortions, preventing late term abortion, than the so-called “pro-life” approach.

She goes on to lay out how Obama is for access to birth control and conservatives are against access to birth control. Thus apparently Obama really does qualify as “the Pro-life candidate” in her opinion. Of course her focus on “access” to birth control is coupled with her disdain for the notion of teaching abstinence. The following is what Mrs. Page neglects to mention, intentionally I’m sure.

Access to birth control is really none of the government’s business. The “keep your laws off my body” and “keep your laws out of my bedroom” half-wits (because they only think of half of it) don’t seem to grasp the intertwining of rights and responsibilities. People like Cristina Page cannot or will not grasp the notion that if government is to stay off your body and out of your bedroom, that must include abstaining (that word they detest) from providing you with hand-outs such as birth control. The self-absorbed “physical pleasure good - responsibility bad” narcissists demand that they be allowed to behave as sexually irresponsible as they please and demand that taxpayers help them deal with the results of their behavior. We are expected to fund profit-making abortion mills like Planned Parenthood and provide condoms, pills, and diaphragm’s to any and all that come to a tax funded birth control vendor (school, clinic, health department.)

Mrs. Page proves her clouded judgment when it comes to her pet issue with the following sentence.

The pro-choice movement, and pro-choice politicians, alone champion wider access to birth control, and birth control is the only proven way to reduce unintended pregnancy and abortion.

Anyone with an ounce of intellectual honesty or even half a brain can immediately see how ridiculously false this assertion is. Aside from artificial insemination, which indicates pregnancy is intended, the only way to become pregnant is by engaging in sexual intercourse. So unless the pro-choice movement is championing the wider access to abstinence, it is doing its public a dishonest disservice.

The left needs as many people as possible to abstain. Unfortunately however, they need us to abstain from individual responsibility. The creation of victim classes and moving toward a collective dependence on the state is aided by an elimination of morality and a reduction of responsibility. Here are some bullet points that libiots like Cristina Page and Barry Obama would never consider.

• With the exception of rape, pregnancy results from a choice to engage in intercourse.
• How can you be trusted to make a choice regarding abortion, if you can’t be trusted with being responsible for your own birth control?
• The creation and growth of welfare programs has destabilized the family. If you want to fix the problem, begin by reducing the number of multi-generational welfare recipients.
• Allow parents to be parents, get the government out of the sex business (which includes teaching children how to apply condoms to bananas.)
• Abortion is the killing of a child.

So far I have only dealt with the role the government should not play and the notion of the individual choice and accompanying responsibility that the pro-abortion libiots detest. The most disgusting aspect of Mrs. Page’s support of Obama as “pro-life” is his grotesque record on the issue. The fact that he specifically stated that his own grandchild would be viewed as a punishment if one of his daughters “made a mistake” provides a glimpse of his shallow perspective. Everything you need to know about this evil or at the very least incredibly ignorant man on the subject of abortion can be found by reading “Obama Blocked Born Alive Infant Protection Act.”

Excerpt:

I first encountered Barack Obama on March 27, 2001, when I testified before the Illinois Senate Judiciary Committee, of which he was a member. My testimony included my description of holding a premature aborted baby until he died:

One night, a nursing co-worker was taking an aborted Down’s syndrome baby who was born alive to our Soiled Utility Room because his parents did not want to hold him, and she did not have time to hold him. I could not bear the thought of this suffering child dying alone in a Soiled Utility Room, so I cradled and rocked him for the 45 minutes that he lived. He was 21 to 22 weeks old, weighed about ½ pound, and was about 10 inches long. He was too weak to move very much, expending any energy he had trying to breathe. Toward the end, he was so quiet that I couldn’t tell if he was still alive unless I held him up to the light to see if his heart was still beating through his chest wall. After he was pronounced dead, we folded his little arms across his chest, wrapped him in a tiny shroud, and carried him to the hospital morgue where all of our dead patients are taken.

Obama questioned whether the born alive legislation would impede the right to abort and doctor/patient decision-making. He and an American Civil Liberties Union attorney speculated Born Alive would force doctors to resuscitate nonviable aborted babies.

Obama opposed Born Alive in committee, but voted “present” — neither “yes” nor “no,” but merely “present” — on the state Senate floor, one of many “present” votes that Hillary Clinton has cited as evidence that Obama lacks leadership skills. Clinton voted for the federal Born Alive bill, putting her on record as more pro-life than Obama.

Barack Obama’s passion for Socialism seems only outpaced by his disdain for the most innocent. I only “Hope” enough of his blind followers (that is surely the kindest description) will open their eyes to what this excuse for a man means by “Change.”

Stop The Obamanation!

Celebrity libiots like those that whine on a regular basis at Huffington Post originally inspired me to start this particular blog. Steven Weber, John Cusack, and Alec Baldwin are all actors whose work I have enjoyed in the past. Of course being liberal, acting talent automatically (just like the ability to sing) equates to a heightened understanding of the real world and policy. I mean, how could a fantasy based, life of luxury not lead to a flawlessly crystal clear understanding of the world?

The biggest of these celebrity libiots (measured in pounds) would have to be father of the year candidate Alec Baldwin. Alec took a few moments away from calling his daughter a pig to write an important piece, “The Importance of Electing Al Franken.”

Voters of Minnesota, your choice could not be simpler. Coleman is a pathetic hack who will do as little as possible in a US Senate office other than cover his own ass and protect his power. Meanwhile, Al Franken is everything you could hope for in a candidate to represent your state in the world’s most august deliberative body. Smart, caring, brave. That’s the choice. Mitt Romney light. Or a return to someone special in the US Senate from the great state of Minnesota.

“Doggone it, people like me!” Alec didn’t mention Stuart’s failure to provide worker’s compensation insurance for his employees, nor did he discuss Stuart’s sticky tax issues. The important issues are much more shallow! Al Franken is a celebrity and therefore, highly intelligent and qualified! His status as a celebrity libiot is enough to overcome his apparent propensity for being duped by accountants (as all his problems stem from bad accountant advice) and enable him to accomplish the work of Minnesota in the Senate.

As an aside, I must point out the typical libiot hypocrisy of labor unions supporting anti-worker candidates is also at work in Franken’s case. Why should labor unions care that Franken avoided worker’s comp. for his employees when he meets all relevant criteria? He is a Democrat and he used to be on TV!

Back to the super-sized star of  “30 Rock.” Maybe Tina Fey has told Alec that Franken has always been playing a character and therefore there could be actual substance there, hidden way down deep. Another possibility is that Alec likes the strength Franken shows by shouting “Liar” over and over at those with whom he disagrees. That type of courage would undoubtedly be awe-inspiring to an excuse for a man who usually reserves screaming and bullying for his eleven year old daughter.