Malignant Liberal Idiocy

The leftist demagogues and their mindless minions that form the FFT (Feckless Fifty Two percent of voters in last years disastrous election) have delivered! Yes, learn what they have delivered from The Wall Street Journal:

Barack Obama Maintains Control Over Banks By Refusing to Accept Repayment of TARP Money – WSJ.com.

Here’s a true story first reported by my Fox News colleague Andrew Napolitano (with the names and some details obscured to prevent retaliation). Under the Bush team a prominent and profitable bank, under threat of a damaging public audit, was forced to accept less than $1 billion of TARP money. The government insisted on buying a new class of preferred stock which gave it a tiny, minority position. The money flowed to the bank. Arguably, back then, the Bush administration was acting for purely economic reasons. It wanted to recapitalize the banks to halt a financial panic.

Fast forward to today, and that same bank is begging to give the money back. The chairman offers to write a check, now, with interest. He’s been sitting on the cash for months and has felt the dead hand of government threatening to run his business and dictate pay scales. He sees the writing on the wall and he wants out. But the Obama team says no, since unlike the smaller banks that gave their TARP money back, this bank is far more prominent. The bank has also been threatened with “adverse” consequences if its chairman persists. That’s politics talking, not economics.

Is this the “Change” for which the drones voted? Want to hear something funny? Just bait an Obamoron into uttering the word “liberty!” There can be little to no doubt regarding the goals of this administration now that they have had a couple of months to capitalize on the “chance” squishy moderates and other fools suggested they be given. (continue reading…)

An unholy alliance, geared toward the complete degradation of our free nation, is being formed according to Politico. The coalition of societal carcinogens is actually called “Unity ‘09″ but of course Unholy ‘09 is much more fitting given the members and its agenda.

From the Politico piece:

A broad coalition of left-leaning groups is quietly closing ranks into a new coalition, “Unity ‘09,” aimed at helping President Barack Obama push his agenda through Congress.

Conceived at a New York meeting before the November election, two Democrats familiar with the planning said, Unity ‘09 will draw together money and grassroots organizations to pressure lawmakers in their home states to back White House legislation and other progressive causes. (continue reading…)

I have, over the past few weeks, seen the error of my ways. I have witnessed the fiery wrath brought upon any who dare voice dissent with regards to the new administration and the path on which it would place this nation. I now know that the ideas of fairness, equality, justice, hope, and change transcend political ideology and can be realized if we, as a collective come together to support our president.

I want President Obama to succeed because I am tired. Having to get up and go to work every weekday morning wears on a person. The “progressive” cuts at my place of employment are evidence of of the “hope” President Obama’s plans for economic and environmental “justice” can inspire. My former co-workers can now sleep late on a Monday morning, resting comfortably with the knowledge that given a chance to succeed, President Obama’s economic message will enable the majority of their former peers to be able to catch up on their sleep. (continue reading…)

We are days away from a historic presidential inauguration, at least that is what we are told in pulsating liberal media reports that seem to be building to the ultimate climax of Obamasm. I would say that the upcoming nightmare is indeed historic, but only because it is the inauguration of an unbelievably bad candidate that should have never stood a chance to win election to high office. While media blowhards like MSNBC’s Chris Matthews are “tingling” with pleasure (I wonder if his “tingle” is related to his spittle stream), conscientious Americans who paid attention during the campaign are left to wonder what the FFT (Feckless Fifty Two percent) could have possibly been thinking. If, that is, they had been thinking at all.

I suppose the benefit of the doubt can be given to a portion of the FFT. Certainly some just did not care to look beyond the fabricated image presented by Obama’s media fan club. This portion of of the FFT allows itself to be (mis)led around by the nose. This group will have unwittingly earned the unfortunate results of its electoral folly.

“What if” pondering:

I wonder what could have been if “Big Brother” Barry had not been effectively running unopposed in the general election. “What ifs” serve no purpose other than the necessary reminder of the tragic chain of events that culminated in what could be a catastrophe (at least for liberty.) What if Mike Huckabee, Charlie Crist, the RNC, and the ridiculous primary system hadn’t come together to ensure an Obama victory by allowing a John McCain nomination? Even worse, Obama was such a bad candidate that even John McCain stood a chance until the (convenient for Dems) economic crash occurred.

If “Big Brother” Barry has a mandate, it is courtesy of the portion of the FFT that did pay attention and knew what they were imposing upon this nation. They have spoken and their message is:

• Innocent life does not matter. Social justice is required for artificial victim groups not babies, which according to Barack “Born Alive, Let Them Die” Obama are punishment!
• “Spreading the wealth around” as applied by wealthy liberals using our money is perfectly acceptable.
• Terrorism is acceptable and a president’s history of terrorist association (Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn) is no cause for concern.
• Chicago politics will be good for the entire nation.
• A president need not have ever done anything other than run for office in order to be qualified… unless registering people to vote Democrat and writing multiple memoirs count as relevant experience. (I wonder if “Magnificent Me” is in the works or if it will be withheld until his two or more terms are up.)
• We want a president who believes The Constitution has a “blind spot” which he can take upon himself to fill with socialist programs and wealth redistribution.
• We will accept socialism in the name of fighting anthropogenic global warming… oh wait, we have been instructed that the buzz phrase is now “climate change” due to the cooling trend. Campaign omen flashback from Oregon speech:

“We can’t drive our SUVs and, you know, eat as much as we want and keep our homes on, you know, 72 degrees at all times, whether we’re living in the desert or we’re living in the tundra, and then just expect every other country is going to say OK, you know, you guys go ahead keep on using 25 percent of the world’s energy, even though you only account for 3 percent of the population, and we’ll be fine. Don’t worry about us. That’s not leadership.”

• We were inspired by candidate Obama’s rare senate action of introducing his “Global Poverty Act” and even more inspired that he is willing to spread our wealth around the globe (….but won’t help his own poor relatives out of his own pocket.)

Yes, the electorate has spoken and this Tuesday a nation begins to pay for their expression of insanity.