The Washington Obamost, it comes as no surprise, has taken a shot at Republican senators who oppose “Big Brother” Barry’s Supreme Court nomination. It also comes as no surprise that they play the identity politics card and insult Hispanic voters in the process.

The article might as well be a public service ad which demonstrates one of the major flaws in politics. This identity flaw has several buds from the common root. First, there is the premise that a group will vote based on group-think associated with an identity characteristic (race, gender, or nationality.) Second, there is the cynical effort to pander to a group based solely on an identity characteristic. Third, there is the devious effort to smear a candidate or a group based on a perceived or fabricated slight to all of a certain identity characteristic.

The premise of the article by Obamost staff writers Paul Kane and Perry Bacon, Jr. is that Hispanic voters will base future support on the current level of support of a Hispanic nominee for Supreme Court Justice (based solely on her Hispanic identity characteristic.) Imagine if that were true in more than a minority of cases. At least if it were, slick political salesmen could have their way with the electorate and be completely devoid of any substance. (I know I just described Our illustrious, Dear Reader, but I cling to hope that a group will not blindly vote based on identity characteristic group-think.)

To the casual observer, our federal government would seem to be spinning out of control. To the more attentive observer, it is clear that the spin is intentional. What can one possibly expect when the leadership of the House and Senate has such a high concentration of particulate feces? Then consider the crowning jewel or plastic cherry atop the Statist Sundae, B. Hussein Obnoxious, as official reader of TOTUS and it is clear that the powers that be do not want what is best for our nation.

Barack’s partner in The Chicago Annenberg challange, Bill “Unrepentant Domestic Terrorist/Guilty As Hell, Free As A Bird” Ayers must be proud that the infiltration of his radical ilk into the education system has brought the nation to this point. Imagine if the education system had not been hijacked by the likes of The Weather Underground. Imagine if public schools actually taught the negative impact of FDR’s idiocy. Imagine if the late Walter Cronkite hadn’t inspired generations of biased “journalists”. Without these subversive elements our nation would have been deprived the majesty of the Obamas, for substance would have precluded their rise to the top.

“Big Brother” Barry might believe “the stars are aligned” to destroy our medical care in this nation, but it would seem that House and Senate Dimocrats believe “the stars are aligned” to reach out to a key constituency: convicts.

Rep (rehensible) David Obey (D – WI) saw his H.R. 3293 pass yesterday by a vote of 264 – 153. I must say that I was somewhat shocked, when perusing the roll call, to find the NRSC’s star “moderate” Mark Kirk in the list of “Nay” voters. I suppose Kirk felt Obey’s bill was safe and he could try to save a little face with the annoying conservatives in our wonderful state.

We, as taxpaying citizens have a duty to provide clean needles for intravenous drug abusers. It is our responsibility to perpetuate the habits of these drug users. Anyone can clearly see that the use of an illegal drug does not make the user a criminal, but a victim. It is the law-abiding citizen that is the criminal, or at least the vile oppressor in the age of Obama. As a matter of fact, those who oppose providing clean needles to the dregs of society are probably racists who to quote Dear Reader “acted stupidly” when they voiced opposition.

“Big Brother” Barry’s Ministry of Truth (The Washington Post) ignores the nasty notion that HIV and AIDS infections could be minimized by the most radical act of refraining from intravenous drug use. Instead, WaPo celebrates the wasting of taxpayer dollars to exacerbate the problem.

I fear that the transgendered community is receiving unfair neglect in the identity politics lottery that is the Obama nominating policy. I believe a wise transgenda with the richness of… his and her experiences would make better judgments than someone (particularly a white person without gender confusion) who has not had those experiences.

Who would better empathize with the litigious cross-dressing male who decides to sue an OB-GYN for discrimination because he cannot have a baby? Empathy is, after all, a requirement for a justice appointed by the current reader of TOTUS. In fact empathy is third on the priority list, following only identity and propensity for wealth redistribution.