Malignant Liberal Idiocy

Grown-ups Against Obama

by Sam Pierce on Nov.02, 2008, under Illinois Libiots, Libiocracy, Libiot Candidates, Libiots On Abortion, Marx Worshipping Libiots

The tidal wave of support for the absolute worst presidential candidate in my lifetime is thought provoking as well as alarming. What motivates a person to honestly believe in the promise of Barack Obama? What is the promise of Barack Obama? Will the Obama media machine’s slick sales pitch to the irresponsible provide a return on the (largely undisclosed) investments?

I believe a large portion of the mindless support for the Marxist who must not be identified accurately (at least according to his apologists) stems from a childish narcissism. It makes sense that Obama’s global unity rhetoric would appeal to people who believe they are the axis about which the globe revolves. Obama and his surrogates have been adept at striking the right chords with those that feel they are owed something. The sense of victim-hood has been magnified, manipulated, and targeted by the Obammunists. Who is responsible to meet the needs (real or perceived) of these people? Who owes these narcissists what they believe they are due?

While I never would have supported the brutal killing of innocent babies, as Obama supporters do (although I’m sure many of them block this nasty tidbit from their minds), I spent approximately 2/3 of my life developing a narcissistic mentality similar to that displayed by the Obamabots. The first 2/3 of my life was unpleasant and I felt entitled to something better. I was raised in environment where I learned to put my own wants above all else. No, I wasn’t taught this directly, but indirectly through the actions and attitudes in my environment. It should surprise no one that this environment was filled with the type of Democratic voters who thought Republicans meant “big business.” It should also surprise no one that these Democratic voters enjoyed their many self-indulgences (even the ones they couldn’t afford) due to the fact that they were indirectly employed because of the hated “big business.”

In my misery, I felt like there should be more for me. I believed that people with good jobs already had enough and should share. If somebody had something that I would like to have, I was jealous. I couldn’t find an easy way to get what I wanted out of life. I was miserable and felt victimized by those that had success. My focus on myself led to near self-destruction.

I was lucky. I met the woman that would be my wife and began to grow-up. I began to see the value of self-reliance and individual responsibility. When my wife became pregnant with our first child I became fully aware of exactly who was responsible to meet my needs (and wants) as well as the needs of the family we had created!

My wife had a college education and a job. I had a low-paying job that I hated. So I decided to do something that an Obamabot would likely never dream of doing. I took responsibility for the future of myself and my family. I went back to school and eventually got a better job. I sought increasing responsibility at work and this coupled with my achievement of a B.S. degree, allowed me to attain an engineering position. During this time I also converted to Catholicism which filled a gap in my life.

In short, I grew up. I didn’t ask taxpayers to provide for my future. It might shock the libiot Obamorons that the misery abated as I accepted responsibility. Another benefit of growing into self-reliance was a new generosity of spirit. I found that once I stopped expecting to receive, I actually felt inspired to give.

I hope the grown-up voters can overcome the narcissistic child voters Tuesday. Obama proposes to make it nearly impossible to follow the path I took. It will certainly be harder for people to grow up and be responsible for themselves when Obama’s job killing dreams are realized.

:, , , , , ,

9 comments for this entry:

  • Carrol
    November 2nd, 2008 on 2:25 pm

    Barack Obama will be a better leader than John McCain. I do not trust McCain. Obama means change for America. McCain means more of the same-o-same-o, no change. Obama is a plus for the American people. Obama needs to be in the White House.
    So Mote It Be.

  • sepierce
    November 2nd, 2008 on 7:32 pm

    “Obama means change for America.” Yay, we get to hurtle into the misery of socialism! Lucky us!

    “So Mote It Be.” I’m sorry, but I don’t understand this statement is the mote (or speck) Obama’s worthiness for office? If so, I think you give Barack “Born Alive, Let Them Die” Obama way too much credit.

  • Roger E
    November 4th, 2008 on 2:13 am

    There you go again. You assume it’s the poor and lazy that vote for Barack. The funny thing is it’s the uneducated, lower income, uninformed that are voting McCain.

    Obama was endorsed by the entrepreneurs in silicon valley as the person most like them. They said what matters is ideas, inspiration and leadership so they built the bottom’s up fundraising machine that won him the election. There is a great article in the Atlantic about it. Search Obama’s fundraising machine. The really trick part is it was McCain’s “McCain Fiengold Act” on political fundraising reform that made it possible. The Grumpy old man’s guys didn’t know what hit them.

    Way to funny. He beat the Clinton’s for G’s sake. Now anyone can run for PResident and win without the support of the party elite.

  • Roger E
    November 4th, 2008 on 2:15 am

    BTW, that Marxist stuff went NOWHERE. Even McCain didn’t buy it and said no, not true.

  • sepierce
    November 4th, 2008 on 6:23 am

    Rogie,

    Do your own research. You search “Obama’s fundraising machine” if you are interested, I don’t have time to do your searches for you since I still have a job… for now.

    If Silicone Valley endorsed him, it is either because they are self loathing libiots who funny as it is, stand to gain from his destruction of their smaller competition or they admire a man whose ears look like they have silicone implants.

    F/O Roger, “The Marxist stuff” may not have gotten enough attention, but it will go somewhere and when it does, I hope you can sleep at night knowing what you did to future generations of Americans.

  • amerilove
    November 5th, 2008 on 5:01 am

    Four years from now, when all of those idealistic college students, who voted for Obama, have entered the work force, will they still believe in him when they find a very large percent of their hard-earned paychecks (and eventual capital gains) goes to those who chose to be less ambitious than they were?

  • sepierce
    November 5th, 2008 on 7:24 am

    I would like to think there would be reason for them to still believe in him (as a father, I hope his plans are not realized.)I don’t think they will, however, if he is able to push the agenda that won him the primary (which he in typical “new” politician fashion, distanced himself from in the general.)

    Once they grow up, I would bet many would rather choose how their income is distibuted.

Trackbacks / Pingbacks

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post and let me know!

Visit our friends!

A few highly recommended reads...

Archives

All entries, chronologically...