Malignant Liberal Idiocy

Barack Obama, Thief of Dreams

by Sam Pierce on Oct.30, 2008, under Illinois Libiots, Libiocracy, Libiot Candidates, Marx Worshipping Libiots, Socialist Libiots

He wrote a book call “Dreams From My Father.” He campaigns on a platform of “hope and change.” He is no mere candidate. He is an iconic figure to libiots around the globe. The fans of “Big Brother” Barry have either fallen victim to his “Rules For Radicals” tactics or are indeed the vile elitists that intend to profit from the coming oppression of the working man. The crowds with their “village idiot” yells, as Mike Church calls them, don’t seem to realize that they are cheering for a proponent of slavery. He is not the vessel of “hope” portrayed by his campaign surrogates (i.e. The Washington Obamost or MSNBC.) He is Barack Obama, Thief of Dreams!

If one listens to, or reads the words of “The One” with an intellectually honest state of mind, there can be no doubt that if his magnificent plans were to be realized, the common man would be enslaved into a hopeless existence. Our limitations will be artificially set by an all-powerful oppressor in Washington D.C… or will Barack Obama follow the example of fellow Chicago Political Machine alum, Illinois Governor Rod “Hair Helmet” Blagojevich and basically “work” out of Chicago? Perhaps this would be best since Obama’s advisors already have roots in the libiot cesspool of northern Illinois. Domestic terrorist, Bill Ayers can set Department of Education policy from the comfort of his indoctrination post at University of Illinois, Chicago.

Slavery would seem like an outrageous description of the potential condition of the American citizen but then again, Obama’s oppressive proposals are nothing if not outrageous! Is it not slavery to work for a master, who will decide who benefits from one’s labor? If the federal government is to meet Barack Obama’s stated goal of “spreading the wealth around” or his ideal of “redistributive change” (as stated in the 2001 interview the Obama media isn’t sharing), it will have to take the role of master to the citizen slaves. Will it be left to ”Big Brother” Barry or one of his ministries to decide what amount of a working man’s labor should be seized to redistribute in the name of prole control? We, the proletariat will indeed require controlling, lest we rise on our own and determine our own livelihoods and futures. Through “redistributive change” those who work will be controlled as their labor is seized, thus preventing any upward mobility and those who don’t work will be controlled as their dependence is fed and fostered. A thoughtful Obama supporter would indeed have to have a sadistic streak to advocate on his behalf.

The young would be compelled to “50 hours of community service per year” according to the “service” page of the official campaign web-site. This can be described as slavery or a sentence. Neither option is pleasant! These “opportunities” for service may be presented in such a way that the gullible and the self-loathing among us find them acceptable or even wonderful. What is ignored by the foolish supporters of “Big Brother,” is that compelled service is much less meaningful than voluntary service. The Obamorons can’t seem to grasp the subtle differences between slavery and generosity or between seizure and donation.

An American was once allowed to have a dream and be free to pursue it. Barack Obama proposes to steal those dreams, unless of course they are dreams of Obammunistic service. “Joe The plumber” might dream of owning his own business. Barack Obama would dictate such a dream is not worthy of his collectivist vision. If Joe intends to pursue his dream, there will be a penalty! Personal success shall not be enjoyed without punitive taxation, or as Barack The Marxist put it “spread the wealth around.” Opportunity is a word that Barack uses to describe his Marxist goals. I am not sure who is worse, the dishonest candidate or the fools that believe him.

Opportunity will have no place in an Obamanation, for opportunity is not an accurate description of taking from the productive to equalize their wealth with that of the unproductive! No reasonable person could describe government imposed limitations on individual success as “opportunity!” As a means of prole control, those that don’t produce will be given the opportunity to eat the groceries bought with the labor of the productive. The people that support such a system do not subscribe to any American Dream. Instead the Obamorons and would-be ruling class would intentionally or otherwise subject the common American citizen to a collective nightmare. Our opportunity will be to achieve an equalized misery independent of our contribution.

Fret not, after some period of time we will grow accustomed to the oppression. Eventually our children and grandchildren might not realize to what you Obama supporters have sentenced them.

:, , , , , ,

10 comments for this entry:

  • Canhandlethetruth
    October 30th, 2008 on 1:35 pm

    Well, this nation is no stranger to slavery.

    Now, our kids are spoiled useless. 50 hours of service is not enough. Two years sounds about right. They really need to know that the World does not exist for them.
    I was educated quite well by Jesuits and they “demanded” 40 hours of service but wanted 80 hours as part of the curriculum. I loved every minute of service I gave.

    50 hours at a volunteer fire company or ambulance corp would make a real difference in the volunteer and the community benefits. Yes it should be part of their high school or college curriculum. It was once upon a time in many schools but then it became all about them.

    No call to service in the Military and resistance to service to the community? You guys aren’t as American as you think. If the Minutemen had your mindset we would have the Queen on our money.

  • Canhandlethetruth
    October 30th, 2008 on 2:18 pm

    You really need to do some research before you throw words around because I am not sure you realize their meanings.

    Slavery was a tool for rapid profit of wealthy land owners throughout the southern colonies back in the 18th Century. It worked for them for over 100 years and like all change in this country it was resisted to the point of violence and mass destruction. Initially they imported indentured Irish peasants but Africans were less expensive and you got more work out of them.

    So when you talk about a return to slavery, American Style, what you are saying is that the rich will exploit us for their profit which we would not have any stake in. That is how it worked for slaves. They worked for no compensation to enrich their masters. They had jobs, which I guess is enough for you, but there were no expection of self improvement or advancement. You work until you die.

    One of the stains on the Constitution was the clause depriving equality to all. The other side of that is Hegel’s theory which was the Master will become the slave, and the Slave will become the master — IS THAT WHAT TERRIFIES YOU?

    Now if you are talking about government requiring everybody to contribute to a collective that is different. There are advantages such as pooling resources toward a common goal but eventually it does stifle creativity and resourcefulness because there is no motivation to do better.

    Since your position has no merit other than Obama’s position is no good I’d thought I give you a hand trying to find some. You really got to work on your position. It would be good if you could articulate that your position is good because it offers ….(fill it in!)

    Now you can do your rants
    right!

    Oh, one other thing. If you study nations that have embraced Communism such as the Soviet Union, Yugoslavia, and China one thing is consistent. In all of those nations communism took route when the country was morally, economically, and politically bankrupt. In every case when that nation evolved and advanced economically, morally, and politically it outgrew it. In the case of the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia the conditions were so severe that beligerent ethnic groups co-existed in harmony to survive. When everybody started doing well they picked up their hostilities where they left off.

    So… if you really believe that communism can set in you are admitting that the nation has degenerated that bad across the board under conservative leadership. Wouldn’t that make you a sucker for voting for all this failure twice?

  • sepierce
    October 30th, 2008 on 4:59 pm

    Truthie,

    Your genius astounds me. I am truly in awe of your ability to cut to the heart of the matter by word vomiting all over the screen.

    You are obviously much smarter than someone like me who thought slavery existed before the 18th century and in other parts of the world as well as in this nation.

    Then again, perhaps you are not so smart, since you prove your ignorance by claiming this nation has been under conservative leadership. You are a lying Obamoron or an Obamoron fool. Who are the conservative leaders of which you spew? George Bush is no conservative, if that is your dishonest assertion.

  • ablur
    October 30th, 2008 on 5:27 pm

    I can see by those before me that they value personal achievement and dogged determination. They seem to have high regard for personal sacrifice and striving to reach your best.

    None of that is possible under socialism. More correctly, none of that is achieved under socialism. The very nature of the statement, “personal best” is removed from existence. It is all about the collective, we and us.

    Like it or not man is generally motivated through reward. If you remove the possibility of reward, you remove motivation.

    Oh, there is negative motivation. Death and the threat there of can do much. Positive motivation and reward will out do negative ten fold.

    ablur’s last blog post..Have You Been Preparing to Vote?

  • Mike
    November 16th, 2008 on 11:45 pm

    This blog sucks. It’s like stumbling into a big, stinking pile of dog shit…

    The conservatives had unprecedented power over the last eight years and fucked the USA up magnificently…

    Your brand of politics is on life support. Get over it.

  • sepierce
    November 17th, 2008 on 6:35 am

    Mike,

    Thank you for finding my blog worthy of comment! Thank you for displaying your ignorance of the difference between Republican and conservative, as well.

    Have a glorious day!

  • Mike
    November 17th, 2008 on 8:20 am

    Eh, I rather thought conservative = ignorant…

    Seems to me the “neo-con” Republicans are the ones who could learn a lesson or two about political philosophy. You can’t separate the two now just because it was a recipe for disaster–that’s not how it works. It wasn’t the liberals who voted Dubya/Cheney and their greedy gang of self-serving criminals into office twice now, was it?

    At any rate, this election sent a clear message that the country now desires to be led center left. So suck on it.

    Have an Obama-rific day!

  • sepierce
    November 17th, 2008 on 8:52 am

    No, 52% of the voters decide to be led into the center of a socialist septic tank.

  • Turkey Lurker
    February 1st, 2009 on 2:34 pm

    I suspect that the Republican party threw McLame/Palin under the bus to improve our chances for a comeback in two years.

    Now that Micheal Steele is at the helm I am hoping for a much brighter future for those of us who are still in our right minds.

    Mikey

  • sepierce
    February 3rd, 2009 on 9:42 pm

    I kind of felt as though McLame threw himself under the bus.

Trackbacks / Pingbacks

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post and let me know!

Visit our friends!

A few highly recommended reads...

Archives

All entries, chronologically...