It’s McCain’s position that abortion for incest and rape is okay. Palin disagreed with him on that in the ABC interview. Guess you didn’t watch your girl try and talk. The GOP party spokesman said they would straighten McCain our after he wins the election. That’s a laugh. A bunch of nobody party hacks straightening out the us President. If they think they can he truly has had a lobotomy. You should read more about what your candidates positions are then you would not need to be told by a Moron.

Palin’s doctrine on teaching abstinance reaslly works eh?

“Little Links” for little minds. That was gobbly gook. As I said I was paying attention when it came out (it was leaked by the administration to the NY Times. and GHWB withdraw it. GW Bush adopted it instead of witting his own. Whose the Moron? Lost in your own fatuity hugh? Most people older and smarter than than Brittany Spears remember it. Here is some real information unless signed copie of DoD documents are less believable to you than your sources (more GOP ditto head)

http://www.btinternet.com/~nlpWESSEX/Documents/Wolfowitz92memo.htm

If you don’t like that one here is a scanned original (signed) from the department of defense declassified in 2007.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/2260566/US-Defense-Planning-Guidance-19921999-Leaked-NY-Times

Sheds a real light now in the reason for the Iraq war? To protect strategic interests of the US (oil). Let’s see now how many of the ever changing reasons can I remember from the Rovian myth machine

That’s right ditto head, no it wasn’t because of WMD’s, they didn’t find any.

No it wasn’t to get Al Queda, they came later.

No it wasn’t to spread democracy, They are and will be setting up a Theocracy when we run out of money and withdraw and we knew that.

No it wasn’t to prevent genocide, we don’t doing anything when genocide is being practiced by countries without oil.

What is the daily kos by the way?

Here is a little link to an article about the “Bush Doctrine.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/12/AR2008091202457_pf.html

Were you intentionally lying in comment #27? You wrote:

“McCain is for allowing abortion in the case of incest and rape, that’s the GOP platform. That wasn’t my argument, pay attention.”

I can’t find any support for abortion in the GOP platform, which can be found at:

http://www.gop.com/2008Platform/Values.htm#5

Perhaps you got your information from The Daily Kos or a similar resource.

Did that lady you know support the death penalty for those children, like you do?

I don’t think “Palin’s kid wanted to get pregnant” moron, but I do believe she probably knew how babies are made.

My precious bureaucracy ? Reread my posts. I’m not in favor of big government. I am in favor of taking care of our citizens.

I did say two years ago I was still hoping McCain would run again and would of voted for him and now I’m not sure who I want after his Bush lobotomy. You really should pay more attention.

The thieves take more of my income than they take of yours I’m sure. You pay more percentage wise now than you did prior to Bush’s tax cuts for the wealthy.

You are voting for a ticket that supports a woman’s right to have an abortion in the case of rape and incest. Need I say more about your rants.

As I said, I knew a lady who did raise these babies until they could be placed in a home, about two years. Then they go on the state and in foster care. Their skin is red and raw. They have very costly complications as long as they live. You really ought to know something about what you speak of. No one will adopt them, or children of schizophrenics. She is a nurse by trade and her and her husband have a small home full of children nobody wants. Babies on up.

So you think abstinence training works and Palin’s kid wanted to get pregnant. Come into a tighter orbit. Get a little real.

I can’t believe you think Sarah Palin’s daughter did not know she might get pregnant when she had sex. I know you didn’t so that directly, but your use of Palin as an argument against teaching abstinence indicates that you believe this. I believe the schools and definitely the federal government should have nothing whatsoever to do with sex education. Have you ever heard of parents and personal responsibility? Why do you believe you should be able to decide how my income is distributed?

I assumed Rand had nothing to do with choice (or any other word for baby killing) but it was good of you to throw that line in there for the sake of filling space.

Crack and Meth babies deserve the death penalty for the actions of their parents? I find that notion disgusting. I suggest that people would be willing and able to take them in and care for them if they were known and people were allowed. I bet your precious bureaucracy works to make that damn near impossible! More resources would be available for individual charity if the thieves in government did not take such an unnecessarily large chunk of a person’s income.

Rog, I don’t believe you’ve ever admitted who you support for president. Are you ashamed of your choice? You don’t believe in God, so do you believe that there was no origin?