Malignant Liberal Idiocy

Prostitution isn’t just for Nevada anymore and this high-priced hooker leaves Elliot Spitzer’s flesh merchant in the dust! Hillary Clinton likely sets the record for most expensive (un-) happy hooker in history. $10 million is a lot of money, but Barry doesn’t have to pay the price for his pleasure, himself. On the contrary, he has asked his “big donors” to foot the bill ( or is it Bill) at the Clinton Cat House.

From Reuters:

Clinton introduced Obama to her top fundraisers at a private meeting in Washington on Thursday night. Obama already had asked his big donors to help her pay off more than $10 million she owes to campaign debtors.

It is hard to believe that the dope of hope, the second coming, is dumb enough to believe he can buy the Clintons for $10 million. It is possible that this “trick” will be enough to help the political whore overcome her sense of entitlement to the highest office in the land… but I doubt it. Most likely, the Capitol Hill Call Girl won’t take this lying down. Hillary will accept the debt alleviating donations, say the required lines, and give the robotic smile, but what will her underlings do?

A person would have to be extremely trusting to believe that the wife of The Rapist would be content to let her entitled throne pass her by. Hilly didn’t “stand by her man” for nothing! The presidency is her destiny and I believe she will attempt to snatch it by “hook” or by crook.

Drudge has a large and ominous headline, “$300B Rescue: Housing Bill Clears Hurdle.” The AP story begins:

WASHINGTON (AP) - A massive foreclosure rescue bill cleared a key Senate test Tuesday by an overwhelming margin, with Democrats and Republicans both eager to claim election-year credit for helping hard-pressed homeowners.

The mortgage aid plan would let the Federal Housing Administration back $300 billion in new, cheaper home loans for an estimated 400,000 distressed borrowers who otherwise would be considered too financially risky to qualify for government-insured, fixed-rate loans.

An 83-9 vote put the plan on track for Senate passage as early as Wednesday, but President Bush is threatening a veto, and Democrats are fighting each other over key details. Those challenges will probably delay any final deal until mid-July.

Tell me this nation isn’t ripe for Obamunism. 83% of the United States Senate believes in putting up 300 billion dollars of magic money (magic, because apparently Chris Dodd pulled a magic wand out of Rep. Barney Frank’s closet and created the money with one swish) to support the bad decisions of people that signed for loans they could not afford. I haven’t checked but I would be shocked if my senator (I’m not proud of it,) Barry “The Dope of Hope” Obama even voted on this measure. Obama is only in the senate after all, to enable his presidential run. He can’t be bothered by trivial matters such as performing the duties of a senator. Don’t fret, drooling libiots rooting for an Obamanation, this is right up your alley!

Any time taxpayer dollars can be pledged and government can be grown, the Obamunists win. The government is the daddy of the nation, it says so in the Constitution (read in Obamunist version.) The protective embrace of the benevolent Big Brother will shield us from ourselves as we are incompetent. I don’t understand how the electorate could be trusted to vote for elected officials, given our gross incompetence. If the average citizen is incapable of making a decision and coping with the consequences, I don’t see how he would be capable of making a decision on election day.

I have a solution for coping with the incompetence of the common man. It is really quite simple. Cut to the chase! Stop having elections! The people in power should make the decisions so I suggest that Chicago mob boss, I mean Mayor Daley choose the next president. The chosen president can then determine the proper governmental structure best suited for hopeful change and bureaucratic control.

The solution is beautiful in its simplicity and we, as substandard beings, require simplicity. We would have the benefits of government generated wealth to be evenly dispersed (well, not evenly because obviously the ruling class has finer tastes and more expensive needs) to cover our basic needs. With our basic needs met, we should want no more. Our basic needs will continue to be met because once the government runs everything… everything will run with the non-incentive based efficiency of any government agency!

I can almost taste the government cheese already. I only hope Barack’s senate (if he chooses to have a senate, if not Chris Dodd may need to refinance his sweetheart deal from Countrywide)  gives us comfortable shoes since standing in line for food could be hard on a man’s feet.

Cross-post from Conservative Common Man:

Jon Cohen and Jennifer Agiesta have a piece in Sunday’s Washington Post with a headline that seems intended to show that white people are racist and if somehow Barry O doesn’t win the presidency it can be attributed to racism. I, of course, assumed it was written by Juliet Eilperin when I read the headline, “3 in 10 Americans Admit To Race Bias.” The headline and the beginning of the article are for the benefit of those that just take a glance and then walk away with the prescribed sense of righteous indignation regarding race relations in the United States. The casual headline reader might reasonably get the impression that the deck is stacked against the propagation of Obamunism, although the casual headline reader probably doesn’t stop to think that he is actually supporting Obama’s version of Communism (Obamunism,) when he supports Obama. Ominously bleak first sentence:

As Sen. Barack Obama opens his campaign as the first African American on a major party presidential ticket, nearly half of all Americans say race relations in the country are in bad shape and three in 10 acknowledge feelings of racial prejudice, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.

Of course the libiots at the Post don’t discuss factors such as Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton promoting racism for profit or programs designed to maintain racial divides. Scholarships for minorities only, hiring quotas, and race-oriented organizations all work together to ensure racial divides will never heal. These factors contribute to the attitudes that the Post laments (before launching into its gleeful “Hope” for racism):

More

Rep. Anna Eshoo “gesundheit” (D - CA 14th) has introduced legislation that would seem potentially helpful at first thoughtless glance. H.R. 6209, “The Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation Act” (CALM,) aims to create a standard that would not allow commercial producers to make their product louder than the show during which it will be aired.

My initial reaction was to recall how annoying it is to be watching a show and when it goes to commercial, noticing the difference in loudness. My wife has complained countless times about the commercials being so much louder than the scheduled programming. As much as we hate the increase in loudness, it pales in comparison to our hatred and fear of limitless government control!

Rep. Eshoo (Sneezy from here on, although Dopey might be more appropriate for this mental dwarf) has placed a Pandora’s Box of limitless government before her fellow representatives. Let us hope that a majority of reps have some respect for liberty and personal responsibility, which is obviously lacking in Superdelegates pledged to Barry Obamantion. Of course Sneezy is one of Barry’s pledged Superdelegates, which I suppose offers at least a partial explanation of her libiocy, or at the very least reason to not be surprised.

You might be wondering why this seemingly helpful little bill is so alarming. After all, isn’t Sneezy just looking out for her constituency? The answer would be yes, assuming her constituency is comprised of helpless children that require total control of every facet of their lives. Maybe this answer is inaccurate, since many children can operate the volume control of a remote control. Perhaps the residents of Sneezy’s Magic Kingdom district do not want to be responsible for turning down their own television sets when an all powerful federal government could take care of the volume from D.C.

The cause for alarm is revealed when one realizes that the initial reaction to a bill like this is often positive. How many assaults on liberty get passed without being scruitnized for unintended (or perhaps intended) consequences? If Sneezy and her fellow Marxists can control the decibel level of commercials, they will. If they can control the decibel level of scheduled programming, they will. If they can control what you eat, they will. If they can controlwhat you buy, they will. If they can control what you earn, they will. If they can control how many children you have, they will. A terrifying precedent is set each time a piece of legislation is passed that enables the bloated and inefficient bureaucracy to engorge its breadth of control!

Here are a few suggestions for regular people that get ticked off when the commercial is louder than the show:

• Turn the volume down.
• Hit the mute button.
• Stop watching the show and tell the network why (apparently ratings are important.)
• Boycott loud advertisers.

Isn’t that crazy? Imagine the notion that a free person could possibly control the volume of his own damn TV! Give the power-hungry Marxists a window of opportunity and they will grab all the power they can. Thoughtless libiots are already prepared to endorse the move toward Obamunism, are they also prepared to give the government control of their remotes?

I was disheartened to click on Cristina Page’s bio and find out she has a child and another on the way. The fact that she has children is not disheartening, but the fact that she has children and still advocates so feverishly for abortion “rights” is. Sadness and disgust are accurate descriptions of my reaction to her latest Huffington Post display of maniacal libiocy, “Obama: The Real Pro-Life Candidate.”

If you are not familiar with the moral decay and aspirations toward Socialism usually espoused by most bloggers at HuffPo, you might think Mrs. Page’s entry is a work of satire based on the title. One could reasonably expect to see such an outrageously contradictory headline in MAD Magazine. The sad and disgusting truth is that Mrs. Page is serious. The demented chair of the Huffington Chapter of Barry Hussein’s Fan Club’s Abortion Promotion Committee writes:

Obama has a huge opportunity to win over an unlikely voting bloc: pro-life voters. The debate over reproductive rights has for decades existed in the abstract; it’s been a back and forth volley over “values” that’s heavy on emotion and light on fact. But the facts reveal surprising truths and they ought to be hammered home by Obama. The data show that the pro-choice approach is more effective at achieving what the American public views as “pro-life” goals i.e. reducing the number of abortions, preventing late term abortion, than the so-called “pro-life” approach.

She goes on to lay out how Obama is for access to birth control and conservatives are against access to birth control. Thus apparently Obama really does qualify as “the Pro-life candidate” in her opinion. Of course her focus on “access” to birth control is coupled with her disdain for the notion of teaching abstinence. The following is what Mrs. Page neglects to mention, intentionally I’m sure.

Access to birth control is really none of the government’s business. The “keep your laws off my body” and “keep your laws out of my bedroom” half-wits (because they only think of half of it) don’t seem to grasp the intertwining of rights and responsibilities. People like Cristina Page cannot or will not grasp the notion that if government is to stay off your body and out of your bedroom, that must include abstaining (that word they detest) from providing you with hand-outs such as birth control. The self-absorbed “physical pleasure good - responsibility bad” narcissists demand that they be allowed to behave as sexually irresponsible as they please and demand that taxpayers help them deal with the results of their behavior. We are expected to fund profit-making abortion mills like Planned Parenthood and provide condoms, pills, and diaphragm’s to any and all that come to a tax funded birth control vendor (school, clinic, health department.)

Mrs. Page proves her clouded judgment when it comes to her pet issue with the following sentence.

The pro-choice movement, and pro-choice politicians, alone champion wider access to birth control, and birth control is the only proven way to reduce unintended pregnancy and abortion.

Anyone with an ounce of intellectual honesty or even half a brain can immediately see how ridiculously false this assertion is. Aside from artificial insemination, which indicates pregnancy is intended, the only way to become pregnant is by engaging in sexual intercourse. So unless the pro-choice movement is championing the wider access to abstinence, it is doing its public a dishonest disservice.

The left needs as many people as possible to abstain. Unfortunately however, they need us to abstain from individual responsibility. The creation of victim classes and moving toward a collective dependence on the state is aided by an elimination of morality and a reduction of responsibility. Here are some bullet points that libiots like Cristina Page and Barry Obama would never consider.

• With the exception of rape, pregnancy results from a choice to engage in intercourse.
• How can you be trusted to make a choice regarding abortion, if you can’t be trusted with being responsible for your own birth control?
• The creation and growth of welfare programs has destabilized the family. If you want to fix the problem, begin by reducing the number of multi-generational welfare recipients.
• Allow parents to be parents, get the government out of the sex business (which includes teaching children how to apply condoms to bananas.)
• Abortion is the killing of a child.

So far I have only dealt with the role the government should not play and the notion of the individual choice and accompanying responsibility that the pro-abortion libiots detest. The most disgusting aspect of Mrs. Page’s support of Obama as “pro-life” is his grotesque record on the issue. The fact that he specifically stated that his own grandchild would be viewed as a punishment if one of his daughters “made a mistake” provides a glimpse of his shallow perspective. Everything you need to know about this evil or at the very least incredibly ignorant man on the subject of abortion can be found by reading “Obama Blocked Born Alive Infant Protection Act.”

Excerpt:

I first encountered Barack Obama on March 27, 2001, when I testified before the Illinois Senate Judiciary Committee, of which he was a member. My testimony included my description of holding a premature aborted baby until he died:

One night, a nursing co-worker was taking an aborted Down’s syndrome baby who was born alive to our Soiled Utility Room because his parents did not want to hold him, and she did not have time to hold him. I could not bear the thought of this suffering child dying alone in a Soiled Utility Room, so I cradled and rocked him for the 45 minutes that he lived. He was 21 to 22 weeks old, weighed about ½ pound, and was about 10 inches long. He was too weak to move very much, expending any energy he had trying to breathe. Toward the end, he was so quiet that I couldn’t tell if he was still alive unless I held him up to the light to see if his heart was still beating through his chest wall. After he was pronounced dead, we folded his little arms across his chest, wrapped him in a tiny shroud, and carried him to the hospital morgue where all of our dead patients are taken.

Obama questioned whether the born alive legislation would impede the right to abort and doctor/patient decision-making. He and an American Civil Liberties Union attorney speculated Born Alive would force doctors to resuscitate nonviable aborted babies.

Obama opposed Born Alive in committee, but voted “present” — neither “yes” nor “no,” but merely “present” — on the state Senate floor, one of many “present” votes that Hillary Clinton has cited as evidence that Obama lacks leadership skills. Clinton voted for the federal Born Alive bill, putting her on record as more pro-life than Obama.

Barack Obama’s passion for Socialism seems only outpaced by his disdain for the most innocent. I only “Hope” enough of his blind followers (that is surely the kindest description) will open their eyes to what this excuse for a man means by “Change.”

Stop The Obamanation!

There are two discharge petitions currently in the U.S. House of Representatives of which the leadership would prefer you not hear. These petitions would force Bela Pelosi to allow two important bills to come to the floor for a vote. Discharge petitions require 218 signatures, so please go to the links provided to find out if your congressman has signed these important petitions.

The first petition is for The Broadcaster Freedom Act, HR 2095, which would permanently stop any attempts to reinstate the ridiculously named “Fairness Doctrine.” Rep. Mike Pence (R-IN) has successfully gotten a one year ban on the free speech silencing doctrine. Unfortunately that temporary ban is about to expire. Click on the picture below to see who are the spineless libiot hypocrites that agreed to the one-year ban but refuse to sign the discharge petition to bring the permanent bill to the floor. The picture links to a site aptly called hypocrisycaucus.com.

The second, but obviously no less important discharge petition is for HR 3089, “The No More Excuses Energy Act of 2007.” My congressman, John Shimkus (R-IL) has signed this petition, has yours? Didn’t Pelosi and her fellow libiots make fuel prices a part of their 2006 campaign? Well they have certainly impacted the cost of fuel. I suppose the folks that supported the Democrat takeover sought higher prices. So  if you think paying $4 a gallon is the right thing to do, you may want to disregard this petition. If you would like Congress to do its job instead of acting as an obstinate blockade to the achievement of the best interests of the citizens it supposedly represents, you may want to ask your congressman to do just that! You may want to call or e-mail his or her office and ask why he or she isn’t doing the right thing. You may want to inquire as to who he or she serves, you or Pelosi the libiot dominatrix.

“Power to the People” can be a reality. We can need to remember who pays the salaries and provides the perks for the elected representatives. Here’s a radical thought… how about we demand that our representatives represent us!

Celebrity libiots like those that whine on a regular basis at Huffington Post originally inspired me to start this particular blog. Steven Weber, John Cusack, and Alec Baldwin are all actors whose work I have enjoyed in the past. Of course being liberal, acting talent automatically (just like the ability to sing) equates to a heightened understanding of the real world and policy. I mean, how could a fantasy based, life of luxury not lead to a flawlessly crystal clear understanding of the world?

The biggest of these celebrity libiots (measured in pounds) would have to be father of the year candidate Alec Baldwin. Alec took a few moments away from calling his daughter a pig to write an important piece, “The Importance of Electing Al Franken.”

Voters of Minnesota, your choice could not be simpler. Coleman is a pathetic hack who will do as little as possible in a US Senate office other than cover his own ass and protect his power. Meanwhile, Al Franken is everything you could hope for in a candidate to represent your state in the world’s most august deliberative body. Smart, caring, brave. That’s the choice. Mitt Romney light. Or a return to someone special in the US Senate from the great state of Minnesota.

“Doggone it, people like me!” Alec didn’t mention Stuart’s failure to provide worker’s compensation insurance for his employees, nor did he discuss Stuart’s sticky tax issues. The important issues are much more shallow! Al Franken is a celebrity and therefore, highly intelligent and qualified! His status as a celebrity libiot is enough to overcome his apparent propensity for being duped by accountants (as all his problems stem from bad accountant advice) and enable him to accomplish the work of Minnesota in the Senate.

As an aside, I must point out the typical libiot hypocrisy of labor unions supporting anti-worker candidates is also at work in Franken’s case. Why should labor unions care that Franken avoided worker’s comp. for his employees when he meets all relevant criteria? He is a Democrat and he used to be on TV!

Back to the super-sized star of  “30 Rock.” Maybe Tina Fey has told Alec that Franken has always been playing a character and therefore there could be actual substance there, hidden way down deep. Another possibility is that Alec likes the strength Franken shows by shouting “Liar” over and over at those with whom he disagrees. That type of courage would undoubtedly be awe-inspiring to an excuse for a man who usually reserves screaming and bullying for his eleven year old daughter.

Barry Obama has legions of young supporters, which seems logical, since the younger one is, the less likely he is to realize what responsibilities adults have. The young supporters probably have no idea from where the funding for hopeful change in the form of socialism will come. One such group of young Obama supporters is Young Communist League USA, which will be referred to as Young Obammunists from here on.

An article on Unity & the Struggle of Politics (Erica Smiley’s bi-annual report) instructs the Young Obammunists on the brilliance of the epic movement for an Obamanation (and I thought it was more of an epidemic.):

The movement surrounding the candidacy of Barack Obama is epic.What makes this candidacy epic is what it has come to represent. This campaign has wrapped up in it all the hopes and dreams for the betterment of our country and the working people it belongs to. This campaign isn’t about a man so much as it’s about what’s possible if we are able to take our country out of the tight grip of the Ultra-right.

Fear not, Democrat partisan libiots, Ms. Smiley adds a disclaimer:

Is Obama a Communist? Is this upsurge around Obama a Communist movement?Of course not.

But who dare say the upsurge around his campaign does not have a working class character? These elections are a pivotal battlefield for us to turn a corner in our struggle for socialism.

Even admitted Communists are smart enough to realize that Barry O is doing the right thing (in their twisted view) by not officially claiming to be a Cummunist and not outwardly advocating Marxism by name. Of course they are not smart enough to have understood Barry’s San Francisco remarks as being a rare moment of honesty about his view of the working class. So he is not officially a Communist Party member, but he is the best viable option for the youth that aspire to a future in which they can:

• Live in government housing
• Live on government food rations
• Travel on government fuel rations
• Work in a government job
• Receive news from the government
• Enjoy entertainment produced by the government
• Enjoy non-essential or for pleasure items as rationed by the government

The beauty of an equal outcome system where misery is shared and evil incentives are removed has not caught on everywhere yet, but the Young Obammunists are on a mission. Actually they may be at war:

In this period, we don’t have to wax profound about all of our advanced demands in order to advance the struggle for peace and equality, as some have suggested. Our task is to build and maintain unity in this surge against Bush and the extreme right. We fight for the most advanced demands of our movement’s center, the most unifying demands against the Right. And right now, there is unity in struggling within the movement surrounding Barack Obama, especially given the divisive attacks on Obama and the speech of Reverend Jeremiah Wright. This is where the forces of unity are mobilizing.

It is not our job to convince people to be even more advanced than they have currently come to be. We ourselves constantly proclaim that it is through experience in struggle that people are won over.

Right now, the elections are the main forum for that struggle.

The American people are fed up!

We are tired of seeing luxury condos built while our houses are foreclosed or rents increase.

We are tired of seeing tuition rise while the value of a college degree plummets.

We are tired of seeing factories shut down while Bear-Sterns and the big airline companies get bailed out by the federal government.

Where is our bail out? Who’s going to bail out the young troops that return home from Iraq?

Labor and people from every walks of life see hope in the Obama presidency, and they see someone who will be responsive to the demands of the broader people’s movement more so than Wall Street. This was exemplified when Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi got a letter from big Democratic donors demanding she take back her support of Super Delegates switching their votes based on their Districts.

Will the not officially Communist Obama, speak at a gathering of the Young Obammunists? That might be to honest and transparent. Hopeful change to Marxism would probably not be served by Barry being that open about his ideals. The important things to remember here are that Barry is not officially a member of the Communist Party and is therefore electable and that apparently life was better in the Communist Soviet Uninon than it is here in the land of liberty. Fret not, libiots, “Big Brother” Barry and the Young Obammunists will never relent in the struggle against liberty.

Juliet Eilperin and Steve Mufson of The Washington Post have a column today, “Climate Bill Underlines Obstacles to Capping Greenhouse Gases.” I suppose this column would be more aptly described as an unpaid ad for the Lieberman-Warner S.2191 (which should be called the Environmental Socialism Act of 2007.)

When the Senate takes up landmark climate legislation this week, its backers can be sure of just one thing: The obstacles they face show how hard it will be to enact a meaningful cap on greenhouse gases — probably under the next administration.

The next administration, not this one, because even supporters of the complex, extensively negotiated 494-page bill say that there is little chance that it will win Senate approval, less chance that the House will agree on a similar measure and perhaps no chance that President Bush will sign it if it reaches his desk.

“In some ways, this is a dress rehearsal for next year, but I still think it will be a useful thing for the Senate and Congress, because at some point we have to deal with it,” said Sen. Byron L. Dorgan (D-N.D.), who says he has yet to decide how he will vote.

So our senators are earning their pay performing dress rehearsals? I suppose it could be worse, they could actually be passing the devastating legislation! I wonder who will pay the $1.2 trillion the CBO estimates the law would bring into the federal government? Don’t worry about giving your money to the government however, because the CBO also estimates that they will do what they do best and spend most of it ($1.13 trillion.) Of course actual spending would probably be considerably more as this is our inept, bloated, bureaucratic nightmare government we are discussing.

It is not difficult to see that this plan’s affect on American manufacturing is potentially devastating. I assume that people who support this bill, like the libiots at The Washington Post, believe that American manufacturing is too strong and needs to be put in its place. Maybe someone should investigate whether or not the Chinese government contributed to the election funds of these libiot senators. This bill obviously would benefit Chinese manufacturers at the expense of American companies. Hey union members, keep supporting the Demonrats as they push you out of a job by pandering to the Environmental Socialists and for good measure, flood the labor pool with illegal aliens!

Perhaps the supporters are looking out for the common man, you know (as Barry Obama says at the beginning of almost every sentence) the people whose livelihoods might depend on producing, selling, or servicing manufactured products. That would make sense in a sick and twisted (in other word, libiot) way. If the goal is to have a socialist society, a certain amount of dependence on the government is required. Perhaps we have already stepped off the cliff as related to government dependence, since there seems to be so little public outrage any time the government, federal or state, snatches another chunk of our liberty. Do people actually desire the life of standing in line for food rations, gas rations, or Vodka rations? Oh, I forgot to include Carbon rations!

The three libiot presidential candidates support this treacherous intrusion upon our independence and barring a miracle (McCain saying “just kidding” and stepping aside at the convention) it is too late to hope that there will be a president that respects this nation’s independence or its Constitution. Barry Obama is possibly the most frightening of the three as his “hope” for “change” is almost overtly communist (more on that to come.) McCain’s idea of “straight talk” is to say the things he hopes the media and his liberal counterparts want to hear on issues other than spending and the war. Hillary is still included and will be until we find out if she sues the DNC for her party’s nomination.

In my humble opinion, the best way to deal with the cap and trade issue is to cap carbon dioxide emissions. I would limit the capping to those coming from government buildings and campaign events. It might also be useful to cap those emissions generated by the parrot press corps. It would be truly pleasant if the Marxist libiots would shut the hell up, thus limiting their own CO2 emissions. If that were to happen, the American people might see things as they are as opposed to as the socialists would have us believe.It would appear that most Americans are too busy to pay attention to the intrusions of government, but if the CO2 emissions of the libiots aren’t capped, many of us will be out of work and have more free time on our hands.

As for the trade portion of cap and trade, I would love to see the Marxist libiots traded to Venezuala or some other nation where they would be more comfortable for people that cherish liberty.